The German Pavilion at the
Barcelona Universal Exposition (Barcelona Pavilion) is a series of
complementary spaces which mirror and echo each other. This was a politically
charged project and a symbol for a nation that reinvented itself by the
representation of using new materials and new techniques and reinventing space
altogether.
Construction is considered a
point of departure. It reflexes spatial expression of the spiritual decision
through a protective and unenclosed space. Architectural form is achieved
through its fluid spatial composition and minimalist detailing with highly
finished materials casting endless series of reflections. Three centimeter
thick double height marble determines the measures of the pavilion. The
invention of steel columns with chrome sheathing further obscured their actual
presence. They contributed to a singular synthesis; a hybrid of tectonic
technique and visual excitement.
Orientation and relationship
to the landscape was primary in this design, conceived as a part of the context
on a slope with a short flight of stairs leading to the Grand Plaza adjacent to
the massive wall of the Palau Victoria Eugenia and a row of ionic columns
centered on the axis of the Grand Plaza. Oriented parallel to the columns and
off-centered to the grand axis, architecture happens on a rectangular platform
in an orthogonal route. The paving stops at the notion of the platform edge
consciously creating a threshold, the extension of the paving to the pavilion
acknowledge being part of the route. This route provided the line of movement
for an event to be created in the pavilion. The existing wall provided the
backdrop and the columns separated the pavilion from the Grand Plaza. It is
speculated that some influence of neoclassical works of Karl Frederick Schinkel
such as the colonnade acts as a detached porch.
Because of the eight cross
section steel columns, the single roof slab acquires a comparable floating
similar to its vertical equivalent walls. The surface of the shallow water
occupies a large portion of the podium, which enhances the quality and
ambiguity with the weightlessness. Elements of the Pavilion include a seemingly
floating flat roof parallel to the platform, with eight evenly placed columns.
It is questioned that if the columns or walls are carrying the roof. Both are
not necessary. Columns are four steel angles originally sheathed in chrome.
There is also a small roof over the office area. A solid wall wraps around
forming a fragmented enclosure. Two shorter walls without corners stands free;
one of them interrupts the axis, hence the movement; making a place to linger.
Together with the entrance steps these walls direct the flow of movement. This
wall is considered a political manifesto redirecting people and interrupting
the reconnection to the axis. To the left is a courtyard space and to the right
is a megaron under its roof. The walls have been relieved of their traditional
role of supporting the roof and isolating space completely from outside and
have become resembling screens being used as instruments in directing movement.
Another wall under the roof acts as the back drop to the core enclosed space.
Walls in the courtyard are
clad in travertine, the Walls around the megaron are colorful and highly
patterned and with core wall in onyx. These suggest the qualitative differences
between within the pavilion. Other walls are in tinted glass allowing views
from and to the landscape. Glass also contributed to the labyrinth quality of
the pavilion. The two small pools added to the mirror effect. The double wall
of translucent white glass creates a portico towards the inner courtyard. This
also blocks the axial view out to courtyard form within the megaron. It also
contains inaccessible roof lights with artificial light for night glow.
The symmetries are mirrored
on different axes in the reflective surfaces of glass, polished stones and
water. Alter-wall takes a place
making role. The statue highlights the vertical connection in this horizontal
master piece.
A building more of surface
than a substance, the stone veneer and a hollow platform (unexposed) roof lack
standardization and repetition of elements; balance of unequal part more than
symmetry and mirror image and frontalism. The content and context takes the
focus away from the façade as a two-dimensional graphic composition.
The problem of collecting
rainwater was solved by placing the gutters in the wall. The pavilion is set on
a narrow 56.5 meter length podium that is clamped between the two end walls. It
is visible only on the eastern side facing the square. The walls are autonomous
and non-load bearing, hence only 18 cm thick. Walls are held by metal frames
with marble slabs on either side like the glass pane that shields the greater
part of the roof structure.
Sources:
http://heatherfinley.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/finley-barcelona-pavilion-technique.pdf
http://www.materialthinking.org/sites/default/files/papers/TransientMateriality.pdf
http://thefrailestthing.com/2012/05/30/the-architectural-legacy-of-barcelonas-worlds-fairs/
http://maddme.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/lecture-7-bauhaus/
No comments:
Post a Comment